MTK Predictive
The problem it addresses
Why forecasts are rarely trusted
In MTK services
MTK Predictive across the service lines
| Service line | Stage | How it is used |
|---|---|---|
| AI Strategy & Transformation | Assess | Use-case sizing Historical data is tested early to show which forecasts the current data can support. |
| Applied AI & Agents | Pilot | A forecasting pilot One model is trained on the client's data over six weeks and compared with the current method. |
| Applied AI & Agents | Scale | Forecasts in the workflow Forecasts feed replenishment, collections or maintenance planning in MTK ERP or the client's existing systems. |
| Cloud & Managed AI Operations | Operate | Drift and retraining Accuracy is monitored against the baseline, and models are retrained when demand or equipment behaviour changes. |
Components
Four model templates
Each template is a tested starting point that MTK trains on the client's own history before any result is used.
Runs on
MTK Intelligence
- Data foundation
- Business ontology
- Governed AI agents
How a forecast is judged
Every forecast starts with a measured pilot
MTK first agrees the measure with the client and records the error of the current method as the baseline.
The model then runs on the client's data in a six-week AI Pilot and is judged against that baseline.
Related use cases
Use cases on MTK Predictive
Ownership and deployment
What the client owns and where it runs
FAQ
Questions about MTK Predictive
Why does a services company keep its own predictive models?
Are the models ready to use as delivered?
How much history does a forecast need?
How accurate will the forecasts be?
A six-week forecasting pilot
Choose one forecast, agree how accuracy is measured and compare the model with the current method.